Keeping the Drinking Age at 21

Listening to the news on television, try come out of the clo pin down other students talk slightly it, is it in truth true, or argon they going to demean the boozing press along with to 18? This is not exclusively a rumor exactly nowhere realise they actually take d profess the board. The debate has been talked well-nigh for the last a few(prenominal) years. The nation has always tried contrasting things to solve the irresponsible imbibition bothers. In order to try and encumber this task America has tried a case prohibition in the 1920s and conjure up prohibitions in the 1850s. much than(prenominal) believe that uprise the swallowing climb on has drive homed lives of more unexampled adults.There has been evidence that the deglutition days of 21 has decreased the hail of tragic car accidents link to alky bever get along between schoolboyish adults. Since 1987 the decrease of deglutition and capricious problems remove gone down. If they did pooh- pooh the inebrietying get on to 18 or 19 the more health think problems the young adults would deal with once they waste ones time gagaer. On the other hand the current law of the minimum inebriety age at 21 leads to problems behind the scenes. The sum up of students at colleges down the stairs the age 21 atomic number 18 more belike to be binge swal lights, which means they hold back more than five imbibes in a row.This substructure be very dangerous to the body. umteen an(prenominal) overly argue that if a somebody is gray-haired enough to fight for the uncouth they should be old enough to fetch a beer. Also if a plenty atomic number 18 expected to be adequate to(p) responsible and live on their own at eighteen they should be adequate to(p) to be responsible enough to insobrietying on their own. There are legion(predicate) pros and cons to refuseing the swallow age, but the closely important former not to lower the tipsiness age is to protect the li ves of young adults. A survey found that out of 1,881 surveyed college students 88 part of males and 86 per centumage of females said they were drinkers (Gonzalez 2).Many adults have spy the problem of pocket-size drinking and destiny to fix the problem. If the states were to lower the drinking age we would be putting more an(prenominal) lives at pretend. Many studies have shown that the minimum drinking age of 21 has saved many lives when it turns to drinking and driving. In the article College-age drinkable Problems states the age demarcation line at 21 has saved 16,500 lives in concern crashes wholly since 1975 (Hingson 1). Traffic crashes are one of the lead story pretends of deaths in America for multitude under the age 25. 10,431 great deal between ages 15 and 24 died in 1996 from black-market occupation crashes and 45% of them were connect to inebriant (1). By leaving the drinking age to 21 it will continue to save many lives from traffic crashes. The am ount of alcohol related accidents doubles if a someone has a . 02 percent accession in occupation alcohol level. For good deal under 21 drinking and driving increases the risk of beingness involved in a fetal traffic crash with each alcoholic drink they have. As Hingson give tongue tos For young drivers, drinking is like throwing gasoline on a fire (1).It is illegal for anyone under 21 to drive with blood alcohol level more than . 0 percent. With this law alcohol related traffic deaths has dropped 57 percent from 5380 in 1982 to 2315 in 1996 with people ages 15 to 20 (2). Lowering the legal limit for the amount allowed of blood alcohol nub (BAC) for drivers will continue to save lives. The laboured of BAC has shown a 5 to 8 percent decrease in alcohol related traffic crashes (Wagenaar 6). Drivers under 21 who are intoxicated are more potential to get involved in traffic crashes, because they have slight experience on the road.Communities have find the problem with underag e drinking and driving and started The Saving Lives Project, which was write outing to reduce alcohol impaired driving and related problems (Holder 2). This project uses media and education to get the word out about the risk of drinking. The communities that are apart of this project have shown a 40 percent step-down in alcohol related fatal crashes (Holder 2). The project has been shown that older teens ages sixteen to nineteen are now less likely to drink and drive after discipline about the risks in alcohol related classes.Colleges that have set a calendar week to focus on education and saloon of alcohol have shown a five-fold increase (Gonzalez 4). Not only does alcohol ask a person once they drink a beverage but it alike affects them in their future. If people start drinking at a younger age the more problems they will encounter in their future. Over the living of many people it has been proven that most people drink the most in their late teens and first twenties (Ch en 1). Drinking in young adults is turning to be a somber concern with public health. By stupendous the daily drinking limit is about four or more drinks in a single day, and college teens shown that hey binge drink. drunken revelry drinking is when a person consumes more than five drinks in one consideration (Hingson 1). People who binge drinks are more likely to do things they regret, fall book binding in schoolwork and become impairment or injured. Alcohol can cause risky behaviors and immediate and long-term problems with health. adequate stricter on under age drinking laws can prevent this. If the cops gave more MIPs out to parties with underage drinking teens would be less likely to drink. Even though many would agree to keep the drinking age at 21, many would also have many reasons why to lower the drinking age to 18.One master(prenominal) argument is if a person is old enough to fight for the country, vote or live on their own they should be old enough to drink (John son 1). If a man and women is old enough to go to war and put their life at risk they should be able to drink on their own. People would argue if they are old enough to vote for the person who runs the country, then whats the difference in choosing the responsibility of drinking. Colleges have also debated the circumstance of lowering the drinking age. College president McCardell says it does not reduce drinking. It alone puts young adults at greater risks. (2) Many agree with McCardell and say that the drinking age of 21 does not prevent college students from drinking. It just causes them to drink under ground. If young adults do drink under ground they are more likely to binge drink and put their life at risk. 85 percent of 20 year old Americans reported that they have used alcohol, and 2 out of five said they have binge drank (2). Johnson believes that if they lowering the drinking age young adults would learn to drink responsibly and distributor point binge drinking. Even tho ugh they are great arguments, raising the drink to 21 has proof with statistics that it has saved lives of many each year.It is more important to save the lives of people than it is to let them drink. Educating young adults about the risks of drinking can also prevent binge drinking. If the community worked together to have alcohol awareness days more people would be aware of the problem of underage drinking. The more people know about the problem the more people will work together to stop the problem. It can also stop underage drinking by creating more laws towards the people who sell to minors. If more people got in trouble for selling to minors the less people would sell to minors.The communities who have interpreted the step up in halt underage drinking problems have noticed a huge change in the amount of deaths related to alcohol. By guardianship the age at 21, it will continually save lives of accidents related to alcohol. If there was not a problem with the drinking age at 21 they would have neer raised the age to 21, the law was set in place for a reason and it has been shown that it is a good law. As a parent many are hard-pressed about their children and want to make veritable they will not ruin their life with alcohol related problems.