Industrial Agriculture Essay

Research enquire Should the governments set standards for the sustentation producing multinational companies to witness the refuge of its citizens and the milieu?IntroductionAs a necessary part of clementkind survival, viands is a tender-hearted right. Small, topical anesthetic family enkindles were the bedrock of traditional rural communities and the world-wide sustenance security which was the talent of countries to pay off the food they ask to survive in a more sustainable way. b atomic number 18ly the global food supply is increasingly falling under the comprise of fiend multinational corporations with policies that argon not surroundally sustainable. Sustainable gardening preserves bio smorgasbord, maintains crud fertility and peeing purity, conserves and improves the chemic, somato catching and biological qualities of the soil, recycles ingrained re stems and conserves ability. Furthermore, sustainable agriculture produces diverse seduces of uplif ted reference foods, fibers and medicines. Likewise, this remains respects the ecological principles of diversity and mutually dependent and determinations the understandings of modern attainment to improve rather than displace the traditional wisdom accumulated over centuries by countless farmers around the world.Although the food fabrication encompasses all those who argon involved in growing, processing, manufacturing or distri howevering food, from the farm to retail shops and restaurants, the nemesis to humans health and the environment is ignored. The major problem is that thither is not a sustainable agriculture system any longer with the start of the Green Revolution in Mexico. Sustainable agriculture is a mannikin of neighborly and economic organization base on an fair and participatory day-dream of development which recognizes the environment and natural resources as the installation of economic activity. cultivation is sustainable when it is ecologically so und, economically possible, culturally discriminate and dirt on a superior general scientific approach. The global corporatization of agriculture has had blackened effects on farmers, food security, and the environment. To denigrate these effects, governments of the world should set policies for the companies that produce food in regulate to nurture their citizens health and for a more sustainable environment.Pesticidesindustrial land contaminates fruits, vegetables and piddle with pesticides. Pesticides boast been know to start maladyes and contri exactlye to the amplification of deaths fetchd by diseases. They seep into the soil which creates contamination of the crops produced and the nearby urine sources. They atomic number 18 a dear(p) and a time consuming form of insecticides and herbicides to clean. They argon subroutined greatly and without neat regulation in the entire uncouth environment. Standards for toxicological and microbiological hazards, and inst ituting procedures and practices to ensure that the standards are met should be set. In his writings, the Andrew Kimbrell shows evidence or so this problem, Since 1989, boilersuit pesticide use has risen by about 8 percent, or 60 zillion pounds(Kimbrell 11). This article was written in 2002. At the present year, 2012, this number has undoubtedly increased. Issues here include leaching of nutrients and pesticides, water parentage and drainage and flooding.Contamination of two globe and get up waters caused by highschool levels of issue and use of pesticides and chemical substance fertilisers is a serious problem, particularly in areas of line of descent or specialized crop achievement. unsophisticated practices ready been found to contribute to non-point source water pollutants that include sediments, fertilizers (nitrates and phosphorus), pesticides, and manures. Pesticides from every chemical class have been detected in groundwater and are comm unless found in groundwat er beneath pastoral areas which are general in surface waters. These reduce the water quality which impacts agricultural production, drinking water supplies, and fishery production. The deaths that are caused by chemicals and the essay of stomachcer would increase.many popular pesticides expect capable of compromising the soundboxs ability to fight an infection, an extensive acquire finds. If true, pesticide use could be a enigmatical killer especially in create countries, where infections are a leading cause of death, says Robert Repetto, vice president of the Washington D.C. based World Resources Institute ( WRI) and a joint author of the new report ( learning News 1). A progressive budget system can be developed in order to support research on production of healthy food. An opposite solution is to visualize and evaluate the chemicals that exist in the agricultural environment. Certain criteria such(prenominal) as evaluating statistics of illness and death caused by th ese chemicals, how government officials are regulating pesticidal use, and establishing alternmative methods of living need to be included when evaluating this dilemma.genetically Modified ProductsGenetically modified products are not natural and increases the risk of cancer. These products are both plants and living creatures. For plants, the genetics of the crops are modifyd in order beat back insects and other unwanted weeds to increase yield. However, the changing of the genetics make these crops moved(p) which is a potential threat to human health. The genetic modification for animals are through in a different way, but it has the same goal as the plants. To act the need for the unlimited goods, scientists have found ways to either increase the body mass of an animal for more eye or to increase the amount of draw that could be obtained from cattle at an paranormal level. Corporations such as Monsanto not only are in control of the crops, but also the dairy farm indus try. Cows are given chemicals to increase production of milk, but the milk causes cancer.In 1994, the FDA approved the deal of Monsantos controversial GE recombinant bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH) injected into dairy cows to force them to produce more milk even though scientists warned that significantly higher(prenominal) levels (400-500% or more) of a potent chemical hormone, Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF-1), in the milk and dairy products of injected cows, could pose serious hazards for human breast, prostate, and colon cancer (Cummins). These chemical hormones are serious risks of cancer. Drinking something natural as milk should not be mischievous for a soul. If nothing is done in order to prevent such a dilemma, the risk of cancer would increase for everyone because dairy products are an important part of persons dietary needs. To solve this problem, an free-living body of organization can be established which would be authorized to scrutiny and develop standards on fo od production. excessively for international organizations developing safety standards to expatriate any trade agreement which products harbor genetically modified substances.The Environmental stultificationIndustrial agriculture have replaced the family farm practices which were or soly sustainable and also taken an extra toll on the environment that is not reflected in consumer prices. The currently controlling system of industrial agriculture impacts the environment in many ways. It uses huge amounts of water, energy, and chemicals, a great deal with little regard to long-term indecent effects. The utilize of fertilizers and chemicals, overgrazing, and the unenforced regulation of grinder farm dumping of agricultural byproducts such as excrement and pesticides into rivers and streams all reproach the quality of air, water, and soil, which are of everyones shared out resources. Irrigation systems are pumping water from reservoirs faster than they are organism recharge d. Water scarcity in many places is due to overuse of surface and ground water for irrigation with little line of work for the natural cycle that maintains stable water availability. Toxic herbicides and insecticides are accumulating in ground and surface waters.Chemical fertilizers are path off the fields into water systems where they furnish damaging blooms of oxygen-depleting microorganisms that disrupt ecosystems and kill fish. In Chesapeake Bay, native sea grasses, fish, and shellfish peoples have declined dramatically in number in the last few decades due to super high nitrogen and phosphorous levels caused by the excessive use of chemical fertilizers(Kimbrell 30). Agricultures environmental impact has full-grown since farmers became dependent on chemical pesticides and fertilizers. Since the 1950s, fertilizer and pesticide use has increased substantially worldwide. If the risky chemicals are overused, the ecological balance in nature would be at risk. Many of the negat ive effects of industrial agriculture extend far from fields and farms.For example, in the United States of America, nitrogen compounds from Midwestern farms, sound down the Mississippi river to damage coastal fisheries and create a large murdered zone in the Gulf of Mexico where aquatic life cannot survive. But other inauspicious effects are showing up within agricultural production systems themselves with the overuse of herbicides and insecticides which has led to rapidly developing electric resistance among pests that is rendering these chemicals increasingly ineffective. Agricultures link to global climate change is just beginning to be appreciated. end of tropical forests and other native phytology for agricultural production has a procedure in elevated levels of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. The governments should pass laws that standarizes the use of these chemicals to protect the environment. Laws and regulations on sanitary standards should guarantee high quality and safe food for consumers and the environment. early(a) Side of the Argument in that location are also positive sides to the development of industrial agriculture which people such as Norman Borlaug says that biotech in agriculture leave not harm biodiversity. Norman Borlaug, who is the arrive forth of the Green Revolution which started in the 1940s was the main starting point of the industrial agriculture we have today. Borlaug claims, If we grow our food and fiber on the land outstrip suited to farming with the technology that we have and whats coming, including proper use of genetic engineering and biotechnology, we testament leave full vast tracts of land, with all of their plant and animal diversity (Bailey 6).However, the problems that the Green Revolution or industrial agriculture itself has brought and will bring most indubitably outweigh the benefits. angiotensin converting enzyme of the core things the Green Revolution has brought was the high-yielding se eds, fertilizers and irrigation projects. Nevertheless, most high-yielding seeds use up more energy to process because most varieties are not resistant to drought and new diseases. This leads to the use of sour applications of high-ticket(prenominal) fertilizers and pesticides. And then expensive herbicides mustiness be used because fertilizers not only stimulate plant produce but also weed growth. These heavy doses of many chemicals end up ruination the soil.This agricultural system is not environmentally sustainable, it only provides enough resources in the short-circuit run.ConclusionA number of food control problems are currently being debated at the national and international levels, regarding genetically modified foods, contaminants (including pesticides), irradiation and nutrition labelling. There is an apprehension about the consequences for the quality and safety of the food supply concerning the increasing use of pesticides and drugs, as well as introducing genetical ly-modified organisms.There are many solutions for this crisis because food is a human right that demands the governments to set national policies to push food security. For example, local and diverse production of food should be supported by the governments and companies to guarantee satisfactory and accessible nutrition for all citizens. Governments must maintain the ability to pass laws for the national safety of their population to ensure food sovereignty. For governments, there is the need for enforceable standards that are convincing for both consumers and the industry.The industry needs standards that permit tractability and efficiency in producing and marketing foods that will serve their customers because it is important for consumers that food control system provide meaningful shelter against real and important hazards. Consumers can gambol a critical role in creating a sustainable food system. by their purchases, they send strong messages to producers, retailers and others in the system about what they think is important. Food follow and nutritional quality have always influenced consumer choices. The challenge now is to find strategies that lead consumer perspectives, so that environmental quality, resource use, and social equity issues are also considered in shopping decisions. Finally, new policies and institution must be created to enable producers using sustainable practices to market their goods to a wider public.Work CitedBailey, Jay. Billions Served Norman Borlaug interviewed by Ronald Bailey. Reason Magazine. April 2000 Cummins, Ronnie. Hazards of Genetically Engineered Foods and Crops wherefore We Need A Global Moratorium. effort Magazine. August 29, 1999. < http//www.inmotionmagazine.com/geff4.html> Kimbrell, Andrew. The Tragedy of Industrial Agriculture. Island Press. 2002Rosset, Peter. Lessons from the Green Revolution Grove Press. April 8, 2000Raloff, Johnathan. Pesticides may Challenge Human Immunity. Science News. 9 Ma rch 1996.